This photo from July 2005 shows the massive Teesta Barrage at
Doani which was built to supply water to lands in Teesta Irrigation Project
area. But the river flow is declining, making the irrigation project
ineffective. Star Online Report
Indian Water Resources Minister Pawan Kumar Bansal thinks there was “a little
misjudgement” on his part to assume that Mamata Banerjee was on board on the
proposed agreement with Bangladesh on Teesta water-sharing.
During an interactive session titled ‘Idea Exchange’ with the journalists of
Indian Express, Bansal went on record for the first time in pointing out the
issue on which there has been divergence of opinion between Mamata government
and central Indian government.
Journalists of the newspaper asked what exactly led to the failure to sign
the proposed Teesta river water-sharing agreement with Bangladesh during Indian
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s visit to Dhaka in September last year following
last-minute objections from Mamata.
“On Teesta, there was a little over-enthusiasm on my part in presuming that
she was on board. What has been happening all these years is that our water goes
unmeasured. We had agreed to work out about 75 per cent of the water, but about
25 per cent of the water was left. And for that, the treaty was to be worked
out,” Bansal replied.
Continued Bansal: “For the first time, we were putting into the treaty that
the regeneration of water in their portion would also be treated as water from
the river.”
“The topography of the area is such that there is huge regeneration of water
in a certain stretch of the river which falls on the other side after the water
leaves our last barrage. They were not agreeable to take that into account. We
thought that it was acceptable to them.”
The newspaper published an item on Sunday on the interactive session.
Asked what gave him the impression that the Mamata Banerjee government was on
board, Bansal said: “That was a little misjudgement. There were discussions with
them. Our view was that it’s acceptable. Without that, we wouldn’t have included
that in the treaty, PM wouldn’t have asked (Mamata Banerjee) to go to
Bangladesh.”
When a journalist of the newspaper pointed out that there was the impression
that the Indian government backs down on the issue of China usurping river
waters, Bansal said, “When we talk to any country, we never talk from a position
of weakness. As far as the suggestion that China is taking away our water, it is
not based on facts. The fact is, we don’t have a river water treaty with China
and there is no enforceable international law on river water. All that we have
are conventions.”
Terming that the fears expressed about the Brahmaputra as “misplaced”, Bansal
said: “From time to time, there have been reports that China is undertaking
construction activity on the Brahmaputra which could reduce the flow of water to
India. But, China has repeatedly said they will never do anything that is
against international conventions and laws.”
“Our independent assessment is that there is no such construction activity
that could divert water on a large scale,” the Indian minister said.
